Starting Over Again Box Office Mojo
Why do some movies fail and others make millions? The reasons vary from film to film, but one thing is sure. It doesn't matter if a moving picture has an enormous upkeep, adept marketing and the hottest actors in Hollywood. The audience decides if a movie is worth the price of admission.
When a motion-picture show flops at the box function, it creates a financial ripple result that is felt from the distributor to the producer. Hollywood has produced more duds than hits over the years. Permit's accept a await at the biggest box role bombs in the history of the business.
The Wolfman (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$80,000,000
The audiences in 2010 had werewolf fever. Unfortunately, this more traditional story of an American human getting attacked by a werewolf and transforming into 1 didn't win over audiences like the Twilight series.
The movie had a stellar cast of A-listers, including Benicio del Toro, Emily Blunt and Anthony Hopkins, but even they couldn't salve it from box part corrigendum. It didn't make dorsum the $150 million budget and was greeted with mixed reviews. On the bright side, information technology eventually turned into a cult archetype, making information technology a fiddling more than successful than near of the other movies on our list.
Windtalkers (2002) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$81,000,000
Every year, studios release a movie hoping to win big at the Oscars. Windtalkers tells the story of 2 U.S. Marines sent to protect Navajo Marines who used their unwritten native language to communicate safely on military radios. Information technology'due south based on an incredible true story, and it should have qualified every bit an American movie classic.
The movie received negative criticism for its clichéd war scenes and its lack of focus on the Native American actors in comparison to the screen time given to star Nicolas Muzzle. In the end, this flick didn't get the accolades the creators expected.
Tomorrowland (2015) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$150,000,000
This aggressive sci-fi flick stars George Clooney every bit a former boy-wonder who has always had a passion for scientific discipline and invention. Every bit an adult, he teams upward with a like-minded, curious young daughter, played past Britt Robertson. They piece of work together to explore the mysteries of time and space. Somewhen, the team ends up somewhere they thought simply existed in their minds.
It sounds intriguing, but audiences and critics weren't interested, and information technology didn't see box office expectations. In fact, it only received a 50% approval score on Rotten Tomatoes, not because information technology was wearisome, but because information technology had too much going on.
Power Rangers (2017) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000
The latest installment in the popular Ability Rangers franchise was supposed to be one of the biggest movies of 2017. It was a revival of every '90'southward kid's favorite show, and it featured autistic and LGBTQ actors, a start for a superhero picture show.
Sadly, the movie'southward progressive casting and special furnishings didn't turn this movie into the blockbuster the creators anticipated. Critics cited tonal inconsistencies, and audiences obviously just weren't interested in a modernized adaptation of the story. In the cease, Power Rangers ended upward beingness i of the biggest flops of the entire twelvemonth.
How Do Yous Know (2010) – Estimated Loss: $76,000,000–$105,000,000
Everyone loves a proficient old-fashioned rom-com, right? That was the thought backside How Do You Know? The moving picture stars America's sweetheart Reese Witherspoon, who plays a adult female who simply got cut from the UsaA. women's softball team.
As if that's not enough, she gets caught in a love triangle with her current pro ball swain (Owen Wilson) and a corporate do-gooder played by the affable Paul Rudd. The connexion between her career and love troubles is weak, and many critics said the movie lacked a functional plot. In the stop, no one wanted to see this confusing, go-nowhere movie.
Sahara (2005) – Estimated Loss: $78,000,000–$100,000,000
Movie adaptations of books often turn into instant classics or go some of the biggest bombs in the moving picture industry — Sahara fits into the latter category. The movie didn't do a nifty job of telling the story in Clive Cussler's bestselling novel, and movie-goers didn't like it.
This one-act-activity moving-picture show didn't practice well with viewers, who institute the chemistry between Matthew McConaughey and Penelope Cruz to be not-existent. The overall script lacked originality, and the flick didn't fare well with critics either. Even though it was visually highly-seasoned, the beauty of the Sahara desert couldn't rescue this failure of a movie.
Gods of Egypt (2016) – Estimated Loss: $79,000,000–$ninety,000,000
When volition Hollywood realize they can't produce Egyptian-themed movies with primarily white casts anymore? You lot would remember they would know past now that audiences don't like it, and Gods of Egypt was no exception. If anything, this movie taught everyone a long overdue lesson on the importance of accurate representation.
The moving-picture show received tons of backlash over the casting — plenty for Lionsgate and director Alex Proyas to upshot an apology for the casting gaffe. That wasn't the only trouble critics found with the flick, all the same. They also ripped it to shreds for its lackluster acting, dull script and overuse of special furnishings.
The Man from U.N.C.L.Due east. (2015) – Estimated Loss: $80,000,000
Directed by fan favorite Guy Ritchie, this picture show was based on the popular 1960'due south Goggle box show. The rights to the testify were purchased all the mode back in 1994, only numerous rewrites delayed the motion-picture show's production, and information technology wasn't released until 2015.
All that fourth dimension spent trying to get the script merely correct didn't pay off, unfortunately. Based on the film'south weak box office functioning, information technology may have even done more harm than good. Even with actors who were at the top of their game, like Henry Cavill, The Man from U.Due north.C.L.Due east. received mixed reviews from critics and failed to concenter an audience.
Fantastic Four (2015) – Estimated Loss: $eighty,000,000–$100,000,000
In the last 20 years, the world has enjoyed a alluvion of superhero movies, and the genre has turned into a highly profitable Hollywood article. Fifty-fifty remakes of memorable favorites have fared well — until the Fantastic Four. The latest adaptation of Marvel'south starting time family did non win over fans.
This reimagined version of the famous comic really angered many longtime fans because of its wildly different storyline. Other than the acting, which received mixed reviews, critics and viewers weren't impressed and chosen the movie cheesy, uninteresting and anticipated. To add insult to injury, the flick only has a meager nine% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Ouch!
Blade Runner 2049 (2017) – Estimated Loss: $eighty,000,000
In some cases, fifty-fifty movies with expert reviews can bomb. This follow-upwardly to the original 'eighty's Bract Runner is a expert example of that. Blade Runner 2049 had a stellar cast, including Harrison Ford and Ryan Gosling, impressive fine art direction and Oscar-winning photography. Information technology was well-received by critics and fans and accomplished an 87% approving rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
None of these things seemed to help the movie'southward functioning at the box office. It underperformed and concluded up costing the studio millions of dollars. Many people speculate that the lengthy run-fourth dimension of 163 minutes was probably more than fourth dimension than most people wanted to spend in a theater.
Supernova (2000) – Estimated Loss: $83,000,000
Is there a term for a movie that underperforms then spectacularly that "flop" doesn't fifty-fifty do it justice? If so, then Supernova definitely falls into that category. The flick had a $ninety one thousand thousand product upkeep but only grossed $xiv.8 1000000, making it one of the biggest losses in Hollywood history.
This picture show not but failed to fill movie seats, only it also got scathing reviews. To date, it merely has a score of 19% on Rotten Tomatoes. Sci-fi fans everywhere consider it to be a joke because of its lack of excitement, confusing storyline and mediocre special effects.
Valerian and the Urban center of a Thousand Planets (2017) – Estimated Loss: $84,000,000
Valerian and the City of a G Planets seemed to accept a lot going for information technology prior to its debut. The pic had an A-list cast with British stars Clive Owen and Cara Delevingne, keen marketing and a high production budget, but all of these things ended up working against it.
The cost of advertising and production actually cost so much that it didn't plough much of a profit, fifty-fifty with decent attendance numbers. Even though it wasn't the worst movie ever made, the reviews were mixed, which didn't aid its cause. The movie only has a 43% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Town & Country (2001) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Town & Country has earned a reputation as ane of the worst movies ever made. The Hollywood Reporter even went and then far equally to list information technology as the fifth-biggest flop of the 2000s. The flick had a star-studded ensemble cast that included Warren Beatty, Diane Keaton, Gary Shandling and Goldie Hawn, but that wasn't enough to win over audiences.
Critics and flick-goers alike institute the plot to be confusing, the characters unlikeable and the editing to be confusingly bad. In the end, it only grossed $10.iv million and has a measly xiii% approving rating on Rotten Tomatoes, making it a depression bespeak in the careers of everyone involved.
Treasure Planet (2002) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
This animated accept on the classic Robert Louis Stevenson novel Treasure Island proves that sometimes information technology'south best to leave a time-honored story alone. Even though information technology was nominated for an Academy Laurels for Best Animated Characteristic, it wasn't well-received past about critics, and audiences didn't give it the time of day, either.
Anybody agreed that the blitheness was stunning and visually impressive, but the story was considered weak. One tough critic, A.O. Scott, even called it a "brainless, mechanical picture." On the other hand, for those who did see it, the movie currently has a 69% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
7th Son (2014) – Estimated Loss: $85,000,000
Critics didn't seem to treat this fantasy motion-picture show that was based on the famous novel The Spook's Apprentice. Many blamed the lack of imagination and an overload of special furnishings for making it one of the nigh boring flops of 2014. It's i yous might non even remember hearing about, as it most seemed to disappear overnight.
The only saving grace of the film was its stars, including Jeff Bridges and Julianne Moore, just even they couldn't do much to help. The movie ended up losing tens of millions of dollars and has since been forgotten along with the rest of Hollywood's bombs.
Pan (2015) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$150,000,000
Peter Pan is one of the about famous, beloved children's stories in the world, but that didn't make people want to see the 2015 alive activeness film Pan. The latest in almost a dozen picture adaptations of the archetype story, the film was criticized for its reliance on CGI and its unimaginative storytelling.
Besides the weak script and the overuse of special effects, an exuberant amount of coin was spent on marketing for the film. In addition to the already huge budget of $150 million, $100-$125 one thousand thousand was spent on advertizing alone, putting the moving picture in a financial hole.
A Wrinkle in Time (2018) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$186,000,000
When it comes to moving picture making, ambition is a good matter, but sometimes movies are too ambitious for their own good. A Wrinkle in Time is a perfect example of that. The long-awaited movie adaptation of the famous book failed to win audiences over and added to the already long list of failed books-turned-movies.
Critics felt it was a visual masterpiece but likewise thought creators fleck off more than than they could chew. Even strong performances from famous faces like Oprah Winfrey, Reese Witherspoon, Chris Pine as well as newcomer Storm Reid couldn't create the same captivating magic the book had.
Jack the Behemothic Slayer (2013) – Estimated Loss: $86,000,000–$106,000,000
This fantastical, modern take on a childhood archetype isn't the biggest bomb on the list, but it didn't plough out to be a moneymaker for the studio. This CGI-heavy movie directed by Bryan Singer got a mixed handbag when it came to its reception, with audiences and critics disagreeing on its merits.
On Rotten Tomatoes, the film scored a measly 53% with a lot of viewers calling information technology tedious, unnecessary and predictable. Some critics, nonetheless, felt the picture was action-packed and entertaining. Hollywood Reporter critic Todd McCarthy fifty-fifty said the pic was better than The Hobbit.
Jupiter Ascending (2015) – Estimated Loss: $87,000,000–$120,000,000
Unfortunately, the only thing people seemed to like most Jupiter Ascending was the beautiful special effects, and that wasn't enough to salvage it from losing big time at the box office. At the time, people were already inundated with space movies, and this flick didn't have a strong plenty story to compete.
The Wachowski-directed space fantasy only grossed $47 million in the U.S. and got negative reviews from critics. Despite fairly original and novel world-building, some professionals reviewing the film said the script was "breathless." Audiences didn't seem impressed either, and the film currently has a 27% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
Ascension of the Guardians (2012) – Estimated Loss: $93,000,000
This one is another disappointing case of a motion-picture show adaptation gone incorrect. Rise of the Guardians, released in 2012, is an blithe adaptation of the popular children's book The Guardians of Childhood. Sadly, having a well-told story already laid out doesn't guarantee movie success.
Rising of the Guardians failed to do the original story justice and ended up wasting a ton of money on marketing. This combination didn't pay off in the long-run, and the studio lost effectually $93 million. At least kids seemed to like it, and many reviewers on Rotten Tomatoes gave it a positive review for this reason.
Evan Omnipotent (2007) – Estimated Loss: $88,000,000
This follow-up to Bruce Omnipotent didn't exactly match its predecessor's success — nowhere virtually information technology, actually. The movie is frequently regarded as one of the worst sequels of all time. Critics complained that, dissimilar the beginning movie, Evan Almighty was a motion picture that had too many special furnishings and offered also few laughs.
Fans of the original were put off by the virtually preachy tone of the sequel, and it but received a 23% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes. Jim Carrey has a reputation for bailing on sequels to his movies. In this case, it looks like he made a wise option.
Cutthroat Isle (1995) – Estimated Loss: $89,000,000
Cutthroat Island didn't win big at the box office, only it did win the Guinness Earth Record title for Globe's Largest Box Part Bomb. Fortunately, Guinness did abroad with that record, merely it doesn't change the fact that this was ane of the biggest bombs in Hollywood. Information technology stood unchallenged for years equally the biggest blackness marking on the box office.
The countless problems on set and with product were the primary causes for this motion-picture show's failure. In fact, the film did then poorly that pirate movies were essentially forbidden in Hollywood for years until the success of Pirates of the Caribbean changed all that.
R.I.P.D. (2013) – Estimated Loss: $91,000,000–$115,000,000
Who would accept thought you could go incorrect with an activity-comedy starring anybody'south favorite heartthrob Ryan Reynolds and the iconic Jeff Bridges? Well, apparently, R.I.P.D. is proof yous can. Despite the box office appeal of Reynolds, this movie couldn't manage to fill theaters.
It's based on the popular comic book only simply doesn't compare to the actual comic, and fans were left disappointed. The concept didn't seem to resonate with audiences, who found the pic to be goofy and downright awful. That would explain the 13% Rotten Tomatoes blessing rating.
The Promise (2016) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000–$102,000,000
The Promise tells the story of a love triangle between a brilliant medical student, a beautiful young woman and her current beau, all set in the historic days of the Ottoman Empire. The creators might have been hoping for an Oscar nomination or even a win, just it didn't happen with this anticlimactic film.
The story wasn't terrible, simply information technology wasn't impressive, which may be the reason backside the flick's dismal operation with audiences and critics. Christian Bale and Oscar Isaac are known for their incredible acting skills, but even their talent couldn't get people to watch this movie.
The Alamo (2004) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
In Hollywood, remakes can be pretty risky when producers are upward against the success and expectations established past the original. The 2004 version of The Alamo is ane example of a failed remake. This motion picture had a lot of things working against its potential for success.
For one, it was filmed on 1 of the largest sets in Due north America, which added to its already staggering budget. The previews weren't well received, which delayed the release. Once it was released, it had to compete with The Passion of the Christ. Basically, this movie didn't stand up a run a risk.
Concluding Fantasy: The Spirits Within (2001) – Estimated Loss: $94,000,000
The popular Final Fantasy series has proven to exist one of the about successful, longest-running video game franchises in history, only all that marketplace goodwill didn't prove helpful when Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within was released in theaters. The movie was aggressive and visually impressive, just that was near it.
The studio hoped the mind-blowing animation and big-name actors like Alec Baldwin providing phonation talent would be enough to make more than the $137 million budget, but they didn't. The detailed graphics had never been seen earlier, just audiences and critics still found the characters to be stiff and unrealistic.
The Lone Ranger (2013) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000–$190,000,000
After the international success of the Pirates of the Caribbean area franchise, Disney thought they could utilise Johnny Depp'southward star ability to bring in some more than big bucks. Unfortunately, they chose the wrong project considering The Lonely Ranger was a huge flop.
The movie'south massive production and marketing budgets failed to depict audiences in to picket the picture show. Despite nearly single-handedly reviving the swashbuckling genre, Depp failed to do the same with the epic western. It probably didn't assist that many people who watched it were more than a little irked to see a white guy playing a Native American character, simply the weak story gets most of the blame.
The Mummy (2017) – Estimated Loss: $95,000,000
After the massive success of the Brendan Fraser trilogy, producers probable saw more than box part golden to exist mined from the Mummy franchise. But did this series really need another reboot? After watching this 2017 version, the answer is "no." Fifty-fifty Tom Cruise couldn't save this disaster of a picture, and it concluded up getting pulled from 800 theaters afterwards three weeks.
What was the cause of the laughable turnout? Deadline Hollywood blamed it on "blockbuster fatigue," saying that audiences were burned out on action-packed movies with tons of CGI. It was intended to launch a Night Universe franchise for Universal, but those plans were scrapped.
The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002) – Estimated Loss: $96,000,000
Edifice on an already legendary career in standup one-act, Eddie Spud became 1 of the biggest comedic flick stars in the '80s and '90s. All of that came to a screeching halt with the release of 2002's forgettable The Adventures of Pluto Nash.
Murphy played an interstellar nightclub owner who is trying to keep his business out of the hands of space-age gangsters. Equally much as people dearest space movies, audiences and critics weren't feeling this ridiculous plot, and it showed in the dismal box function performance. The movie only brought in a puny $7 million, a tiny fraction of its $100 meg budget.
Mars Needs Moms (2011) – Estimated Loss: $100,000,000–$144,000,000
Mars Needs Moms might be one of Disney'due south biggest blunders. It had a classic problem with overspending, which explains the $150 one thousand thousand dollar budget. In addition to the enormous product budget, the studio spent $25 million on advertizing. This fabricated it almost incommunicable for Pixar to turn a profit, which they didn't.
Expenses weren't the only problem, however. No i seemed to similar the movie, mostly due to its creepy hyper-realistic animation. It got terrible reviews and currently has a 37% approving rating on Rotten Tomatoes. If you missed this one when it came out, the only value is for a cringe-spotter.
Source: https://www.ask.com/tvmovies/biggest-box-office-bombs-hollywood-history?utm_content=params%3Ao%3D740004%26ad%3DdirN%26qo%3DserpIndex
0 Response to "Starting Over Again Box Office Mojo"
Post a Comment